Grothendieck Section Conjecture
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
Let \(K\) be a field finitely generated over \(\mathbb Q\), put \(G_K=\operatorname{Gal}(\bar K/K)\), and let \(X/K\) be a smooth, projective, geometrically connected curve of genus \(g\ge2\). After choosing a geometric base point, its étale fundamental groups fit into the exact sequence
\[
1\to\pi_1^{\mathrm{\acute et}}(X_{\bar K})
\to\pi_1^{\mathrm{\acute et}}(X)
\to G_K\to1.
\] The map sending \(x\in X(K)\) to the conjugacy class (under \(\pi_1^{\mathrm{\acute et}}(X_{\bar K})\)) of the section \(G_K\to\pi_1^{\mathrm{\acute et}}(X)\) determined by \(x\) is a bijection.Notes
In his 1983 letter to Faltings, Grothendieck proposed that rational points on curves should be governed by the étale fundamental group [Grothendieck1983Faltings]. For a smooth projective geometrically connected curve of genus over a field finitely generated over , the group is an extension of by the geometric fundamental group, and every point of determines a section of this extension, well defined up to conjugacy. The section conjecture asserts that this map from rational points to conjugacy classes of sections is a bijection.
Injectivity has been known for a long time, and there are substantial results in local and birational settings: Mochizuki's local pro- anabelian geometry established strong theorems for curves over -adic fields [Mochizuki1999Anabelian], and Stix's monograph collects much of what is known around the conjecture [Stix2013RationalPoints].
The essential open part is surjectivity: showing that every section of the extension is point-theoretic, i.e. arises from a rational point. Over number fields this remains unproved, and no general strategy has been carried through.
References (3)
- [Grothendieck1983Faltings]
Brief an G. Faltings
Open ↗Alexander Grothendieck · 1983 · misc
- [Mochizuki1999Anabelian]
The local pro- anabelian geometry of curves
Open ↗Shinichi Mochizuki · 1999 · misc
- [Stix2013RationalPoints]
Rational Points and Arithmetic of Fundamental Groups
Open ↗Jakob Stix · 2013 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.