Hartshorne Complete-Intersection Conjecture

OPENMajorConjectureProposed 1974 · Full conjecture

Canonical statement

If XPCnX\subset\mathbb P^n_\mathbb C is a smooth closed subvariety with dimX>2n/3\dim X>2n/3, then XX is a complete intersection in Pn\mathbb P^n: its homogeneous ideal is generated by codimPnX\operatorname{codim}_{\mathbb P^n}X homogeneous polynomials.
View source LaTeX
If \(X\subset\mathbb P^n_\mathbb C\) is a smooth closed subvariety with \(\dim X>2n/3\), then \(X\) is a complete intersection in \(\mathbb P^n\): its homogeneous ideal is generated by \(\operatorname{codim}_{\mathbb P^n}X\) homogeneous polynomials.

Hartshorne conjectured in 1974 that smooth projective varieties of sufficiently small codimension must be complete intersections: if XPCnX\subset\mathbb P^n_\mathbb C is smooth with dimX>2n/3\dim X>2n/3, its homogeneous ideal should be generated by exactly codimX\operatorname{codim}X forms [Hartshorne1974SmallCodimension]. The conjecture reflects the fact that low-codimension subvarieties of projective space obey strong topological and cohomological constraints that make them resemble complete intersections.

The first genuinely open situation is codimension two, where by the Serre correspondence the conjecture is closely tied to the splitting of rank-two vector bundles on projective space; the decomposability criterion of Barth and Van de Ven for 22-bundles belongs to this circle of ideas [BarthVanDeVen1974]. Positive results are known in various small-codimension and positivity ranges, including the work of Ionescu and Russo on conic-connected manifolds [IonescuRusso2012Hartshorne], but the general statement near the boundary dimX>2n/3\dim X>2n/3 resists current methods.

The conjecture remains open; a resolution must either produce a complete-intersection structure for every such XX or exhibit a smooth low-codimension subvariety of projective space that is not one.

The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.