Plane Jacobian Conjecture
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
If \(F=(F_1,F_2):\mathbb C^2\to\mathbb C^2\) is a polynomial map and
\[
\det\!\left(\frac{\partial F_i}{\partial x_j}\right)_{1\le i,j\le 2}
\in\mathbb C^\times,
\] then there is a polynomial map \(G:\mathbb C^2\to\mathbb C^2\) satisfying \(G\circ F=F\circ G=\operatorname{id}_{\mathbb C^2}\).Notes
The plane Jacobian conjecture asks whether every polynomial map whose Jacobian determinant is a nonzero constant must be invertible, with a polynomial inverse. The question goes back to Keller's 1939 paper on entire Cremona transformations [Keller1939], and in dimension one the analogous statement is elementary.
For decades the problem was studied in all dimensions at once. Bass, Connell and Wright reduced the general conjecture to maps of degree three [BassConnellWright1982], and Drużkowski developed an effective approach with further reductions [Druzkowski1983]. This landscape changed in July 2026, when an explicit counterexample in dimension three, formally verified in both Isabelle/HOL and Lean, refuted the general conjecture [JacobianCounterexampleAFP2026]; padding with identity coordinates then refutes it in every dimension .
The counterexample makes no claim about dimension two, which is now the only unresolved case, and the classical reductions pass through higher-dimensional maps, so they no longer bear on it directly. The plane case therefore stands sharply isolated and remains open: settling it requires either a genuinely two-dimensional proof of invertibility or a plane counterexample.
Proof-claim watch (1)
References (4)
- [Keller1939]
Ganze Cremona-Transformationen
Open ↗Ott-Heinrich Keller · 1939 · misc
- [BassConnellWright1982]
The Jacobian conjecture: reduction of degree and formal expansion of the inverse
Open ↗Hyman Bass, Edwin H. Connell, and David Wright · 1982 · misc
- [Druzkowski1983]
An effective approach to Keller’s Jacobian conjecture
Open ↗Ludwik M. Drużkowski · 1983 · misc
- [JacobianCounterexampleAFP2026]
Formal Verification of an Explicit Counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture
Open ↗Arthur Freitas Ramos and David Barros Hulak and Ruy Jose Guerra Barretto de Queiroz · 2026 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.