Kakeya set conjecture in dimensions
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
Let \(n\ge4\) and let \(E\subset\mathbb R^n\) be a Borel set such that for every \(v\in S^{n-1}\) there is \(x_v\in\mathbb R^n\) with \(\{x_v+tv:0\le t\le1\}\subset E\). Then \(\dim_{\mathrm H}E=n\).Notes
A Kakeya (Besicovitch) set in is a set containing a unit line segment in every direction. The Kakeya set conjecture asserts that such a set, even if it has Lebesgue measure zero, must have full Hausdorff dimension . The modern Hausdorff-dimension formulation emerged around the early 1970s; this entry records the cases .
The planar case is classical: Kakeya sets in have dimension . In higher dimensions a long sequence of partial lower bounds was developed through geometric, combinatorial and polynomial methods [Wolff1999KakeyaSurvey], [Zahl2025KakeyaSurvey]. The three-dimensional case was settled by Wang and Zahl, whose proof proceeds through volume estimates for unions of convex sets [WangZahl2025Kakeya3D]; the argument is the subject of a Bourbaki exposition [Tao2026KakeyaBourbaki].
The stronger Kakeya maximal function inequality, which would imply the set conjecture, is likewise unresolved. Despite the accumulated partial dimension bounds, the Kakeya set conjecture remains open in every dimension .
References (4)
- [Wolff1999KakeyaSurvey]
Recent work connected with the Kakeya problem
1999 · misc
- [WangZahl2025Kakeya3D]
Volume estimates for unions of convex sets, and the Kakeya set conjecture in three dimensions
Open ↗2025 · misc
- [Zahl2025KakeyaSurvey]
A survey of the Kakeya conjecture, 2000–2025
Open ↗2025 · misc
- [Tao2026KakeyaBourbaki]
The Kakeya conjecture, after Wang and Zahl
Open ↗2026 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.