Mahler Volume-Product Conjecture
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
For a convex body \(K\subset\mathbb R^d\) containing
\(0\) in its interior, put
\(K^\circ=\{y:\langle x,y\rangle\leq1\ \forall x\in K\}\).
If \(K=-K\), then
\[
\operatorname{vol}(K)\operatorname{vol}(K^\circ)
\geq\frac{4^d}{d!}.
\]
For arbitrary \(K\), let \(s(K)\) be its Santaló point, the minimizer of
\(\operatorname{vol}((K-x)^\circ)\) over
\(x\in\operatorname{int}K\). Then
\[
\operatorname{vol}(K)
\operatorname{vol}((K-s(K))^\circ)
\geq\frac{(d+1)^{d+1}}{(d!)^2}.
\]Notes
Mahler asked in 1939 for the minimum of the volume product of a convex body and its polar, beginning with convex polygons in the plane [Mahler1939]. The conjecture has two standard forms with different extremizers: for origin-symmetric bodies the minimum should be , attained by the cube and its polar the cross-polytope, while for arbitrary bodies, with the polar taken at the Santaló point, the conjectured minimum would be attained by the simplex.
The sharp bounds are known in dimension and for various special classes of bodies. In general dimension the landmark Bourgain–Milman inequality gives a lower bound of the conjectured exponential order, that is, within a factor of the conjecture for an absolute constant [BourgainMilman1987]. The state of the art, together with the many related inequalities, is surveyed by Fradelizi, Meyer, and Zvavitch [FradeliziMeyerZvavitch2023].
In arbitrary dimension both sharp inequalities remain open; the cube–cross-polytope pair and the simplex remain the conjectured extremizers, and establishing the corresponding sharp lower bounds is the outstanding problem.
References (3)
- [Mahler1939]
Ein Minimalproblem für konvexe Polygone
Kurt Mahler · 1939 · misc
- [BourgainMilman1987]
New volume ratio properties for convex symmetric bodies in \mathbb R^n
Open ↗Jean Bourgain and Vitali D. Milman · 1987 · misc
- [FradeliziMeyerZvavitch2023]
Volume product
Open ↗Matthieu Fradelizi and Mathieu Meyer and Artem Zvavitch · 2023 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.