Purely cosmetic surgery conjecture
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
Let \(K\subset S^{3}\) be a nontrivial knot and, for each slope \(t\in\mathbb Q\cup\{\infty\}\) in the meridian--longitude basis, let \(S^{3}_{t}(K)\) denote the result of \(t\)-Dehn filling its exterior. If \(r,s\in\mathbb Q\cup\{\infty\}\) and \(S^{3}_{r}(K)\) and \(S^{3}_{s}(K)\) are orientation-preservingly homeomorphic, then \(r=s\).Notes
A pair of Dehn surgeries on the same knot along distinct slopes is called purely cosmetic if the resulting -manifolds are homeomorphic by an orientation-preserving homeomorphism. The conjecture, which dates to around 1990 and is associated with the study of cosmetic surgery on knots by Bleiler, Hodgson and Weeks [BleilerHodgsonWeeks1990Cosmetic], asserts that no nontrivial knot in admits such a pair: if preserving orientation, then . Orientation-reversing ("chirally cosmetic") pairs are a different phenomenon and are not asserted to be impossible.
Heegaard Floer homology has been the main engine of progress: Ni and Wu drastically reduced the set of slope pairs that could possibly be cosmetic [NiWu2015Cosmetic]. Combined with finite-type invariants and with hyperbolic-geometric certification, computational verification now covers all knots through large crossing ranges [FuterPurcellSchleimer2025ExcludingCosmetic].
No argument yet covers all knots and all slopes simultaneously, so the conjecture remains open in general; a resolution requires closing the residual families of candidate slope pairs for arbitrary knots.
References (3)
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.