Whitehead Asphericity Conjecture
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
Every connected subcomplex of an aspherical two-dimensional CW complex is aspherical.Notes
Whitehead's asphericity conjecture says that every connected subcomplex of a two-dimensional aspherical CW complex is itself aspherical [Whitehead1941AddingRelations]. Since a two-complex has no cells above dimension two, this is equivalently the assertion that the subcomplex has trivial second homotopy group. The hypothesis that the ambient complex is aspherical is essential.
Two recent preprints claim complete proofs by different routes: Pasku uses identities among relations and crossed-module methods [Pasku2021Whitehead], while Kawauchi proposes a geometric argument through links and homology [Kawauchi2024Whitehead]. Neither claim has yet acquired an independently checked, broadly accepted proof, so both remain on the proof-claim watchlist rather than changing the catalog status.
Contemporary work still treats the classical integral conjecture as open. Mikhovich proves related rational and pro- asphericity results while explicitly distinguishing them from the unresolved Whitehead problem [Mikhovich2025Whitehead]. The remaining gap is therefore the full subcomplex statement, not one of these completed analogues.
Proof-claim watch (1)
References (4)
- [Whitehead1941AddingRelations]
On adding relations to homotopy groups
Open ↗J. H. C. Whitehead · 1941 · misc
- [Pasku2021Whitehead]
An answer to the Whitehead asphericity question
Open ↗Elton Pasku · 2021 · misc
- [Kawauchi2024Whitehead]
Whitehead aspherical conjecture via ribbon sphere-link
Open ↗Akio Kawauchi · 2024 · misc
- [Mikhovich2025Whitehead]
Rational and $p$-adic analogues of J. H. C. Whitehead's conjecture
Open ↗Andrey M. Mikhovich · 2025 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.