Three-dimensional Coulomb crystallization
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
Let \(\Lambda_L=(\mathbb R/L\mathbb Z)^3\), let \(N=L^3\in\mathbb N\), and let \(G_L\) be the zero-mean periodic Coulomb Green function satisfying \(-\Delta G_L=4\pi(\delta_0-L^{-3})\). For pairwise distinct \(x_1,\ldots,x_N\in\Lambda_L\), define the neutral-jellium energy, with the point self-energies omitted, by \[ E_L(x_1,\ldots,x_N)=\sum_{1\le i<j\le N}G_L(x_i-x_j)-\sum_{i=1}^N\int_{\Lambda_L}G_L(x_i-y)\,dy+\frac12\iint_{\Lambda_L^2}G_L(x-y)\,dx\,dy. \] Then \[ \lim_{\substack{L\to\infty\\L^3\in\mathbb N}}L^{-3}\inf_{\substack{x_1,\ldots,x_{L^3}\in\Lambda_L\\x_i\ne x_j\ (i\ne j)}}E_L(x_1,\ldots,x_{L^3}) =e_{\mathrm{BCC}}, \] where \(e_{\mathrm{BCC}}\) is the thermodynamic energy per unit volume of the unit-density body-centered-cubic lattice under the same normalization.Notes
This is the three-dimensional Coulomb, or jellium, crystallization conjecture: the mathematical form of the prediction that electrons in a uniform neutralizing background arrange themselves into a crystal. For point charges on the torus interacting through the periodic Coulomb potential against a uniform background, the conjecture states that the minimal energy per unit volume converges, as , to the corresponding energy of unit-density body-centered-cubic configurations. The date is approximate: the BCC prediction developed from Wigner's 1934 study of the interaction of electrons in metals [Wigner1934InteractionElectrons].
Rigorous crystallization results are scarce: they exist for selected one-dimensional interactions and for exceptional dimensions and potentials, but not for the three-dimensional Coulomb gas; see [BlancLewin2015CrystallizationReview] for a broad review. The jellium energy is known to agree with that of the uniform electron gas at next order [CotarPetrache2019JelliumUEG], and Petrache and Serfaty showed that crystallization for Coulomb and Riesz interactions would follow from the Cohn–Kumar conjecture on the universal optimality of lattices [PetracheSerfaty2020CoulombCrystallization].
Unconditionally, even the equality of the ground-state energy density with the BCC Madelung value is unknown — and convergence of the minimizers themselves is a stronger statement still — so the conjecture remains open.
References (4)
- [Wigner1934InteractionElectrons]
On the interaction of electrons in metals
Open ↗1934 · misc
- [BlancLewin2015CrystallizationReview]
The crystallization conjecture: a review
Open ↗2015 · misc
- [CotarPetrache2019JelliumUEG]
Equality of the jellium and uniform electron gas next-order asymptotic terms
2019 · misc
- [PetracheSerfaty2020CoulombCrystallization]
Crystallization for Coulomb and Riesz interactions as a consequence of the Cohn–Kumar conjecture
Open ↗2020 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.