General spacetime Penrose inequality
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
Let \((M^3,g,k)\) be a smooth, connected, orientable, complete asymptotically flat initial data set. Define its energy and momentum densities by \[ 16\pi\mu=R_g+(\operatorname{tr}_gk)^2-|k|_g^2,\qquad 8\pi J=\operatorname{div}_g\!\left(k-(\operatorname{tr}_gk)g\right), \] assume the dominant energy condition \(\mu\ge |J|_g\), and fix an asymptotically flat end. Let \(\Sigma\) be an outermost apparent horizon relative to that end, allowing a disjoint union of marginally outer trapped components \(H+\operatorname{tr}_{\Sigma}k=0\) and marginally inner trapped components \(H-\operatorname{tr}_{\Sigma}k=0\). Define \(A\) to be the infimum of the total \(g\)-areas of smooth closed surfaces enclosing \(\Sigma\) relative to the chosen end. If the ADM energy-momentum of the end is \((E,P)\) and \(m_{\mathrm{ADM}}=\sqrt{E^2-|P|^2}\), then \[ m_{\mathrm{ADM}}\ge\sqrt{\frac{A}{16\pi}}. \] Equality should occur only when the exterior data arise from a spacelike slice of the Schwarzschild spacetime.Notes
The Penrose inequality is a conjectured quantitative strengthening of the positive mass theorem for initial data containing black holes. For a complete asymptotically flat initial data set satisfying the dominant energy condition, with outermost apparent horizon , the ADM mass should satisfy , where is the least area of a surface enclosing , with equality only for slices of the Schwarzschild spacetime. Penrose proposed the inequality in 1973 as a consistency test for cosmic censorship: data violating it would be a candidate counterexample to the standard picture of gravitational collapse [Penrose1973NakedSingularities].
The least-enclosing-area formulation is essential: versions using the raw area of an arbitrary trapped surface, or naively of the outermost horizon itself, admit counterexamples. The time-symmetric (Riemannian) case is a theorem, and sharp results hold under substantial symmetry or other extra hypotheses; see [Mars2009PenroseStatus] for a survey. For fully general data, a spacetime Penrose inequality is now known with a universal but far-from-sharp constant [AllenBrydenKazarasKhuri2025SuboptimalPenrose], while recent sharp statements remain conditional, assuming jump, area-maximizing, or quasi-final-state hypotheses [Xu2025ConditionalSpacetimePenrose].
The sharp inequality for arbitrary asymptotically flat initial data remains open.
References (4)
- [Penrose1973NakedSingularities]
Naked singularities
Open ↗Roger Penrose · 1973 · article
- [Mars2009PenroseStatus]
Present status of the Penrose inequality
Open ↗Marc Mars · 2009 · article
- [AllenBrydenKazarasKhuri2025SuboptimalPenrose]
Proof of the Spacetime Penrose Inequality With Suboptimal Constant in the Asymptotically Flat and Asymptotically Hyperboloidal Regimes
Open ↗Brian Allen and Edward Bryden and Demetre Kazaras and Marcus Khuri · 2025 · misc
- [Xu2025ConditionalSpacetimePenrose]
The Spacetime Penrose Inequality: Conditional Results for Stable MOTS and General Trapped Surfaces
Open ↗Da Xu · 2025 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.