Odd Perfect Number Conjecture
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
There is no odd positive integer \(n\) satisfying \(\sigma(n)=2n\), where \(\sigma(n)=\sum_{d\mid n,\ d>0}d\).Notes
A perfect number equals the sum of its proper divisors, that is, . The even ones are completely understood: by results going back to Euclid and completed by Euler, they are exactly the numbers with prime. Whether an odd perfect number exists is a question of genuine antiquity — so old that no first proposer or date can be assigned reliably — and the conjecture is that none does. Euler began its modern study, showing that an odd perfect number would have to take the rigid form with prime and [Euler1849Perfect].
Modern work has accumulated severe necessary conditions on a hypothetical example. Nielsen proved that an odd perfect number must have at least nine distinct prime factors [Nielsen2007OddPerfect], and Ochem and Rao showed that it must exceed [OchemRao2012OddPerfect]; a web of congruence restrictions constrains its shape further.
None of these constraints has produced a contradiction, and no example has been found. The problem remains open: a resolution requires either exhibiting an odd with or proving that the ever-tightening conditions are jointly unsatisfiable.
References (3)
- [Euler1849Perfect]
Tractatus de numerorum doctrina capita sedecim quae supersunt
Open ↗Leonhard Euler · 1849 · misc
- [Nielsen2007OddPerfect]
Odd perfect numbers have at least nine distinct prime factors
Open ↗Pace P. Nielsen · 2007 · misc
- [OchemRao2012OddPerfect]
Odd perfect numbers are greater than
Open ↗Pascal Ochem and Michaël Rao · 2012 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.