Artin’s Primitive Root Conjecture
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
Let \(g\in\mathbb Z\setminus\{-1,0,1\}\) be not a perfect square. For \(n\ge1\), let \(\zeta_n=e^{2\pi i/n}\), let \(\mu(n)\) be the Möbius function (zero if a prime square divides \(n\), and \((-1)^r\) if \(n\) is a product of \(r\) distinct primes), and put
\[
\delta(g)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}
\frac{\mu(n)}
{[\mathbb Q(\zeta_n,g^{1/n}):\mathbb Q]}.
\] Then \(\delta(g)>0\) and, as \(x\to\infty\),
\[
\#\{p\le x:p\text{ prime},\ p\nmid g,\
g\text{ generates }(\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z)^\times\}
\sim \delta(g)\operatorname{Li}(x),
\] where \(\operatorname{Li}(x)=\int_2^xdt/\log t\); the field in the denominator is independent of the choice of the \(n\)-th root of \(g\).Notes
In a letter to Hasse of 27 September 1927, Artin conjectured that any integer other than , , and not a perfect square is a primitive root modulo for infinitely many primes , indeed for a set of primes of positive density [Artin1927Primitive]. The quantitative form predicts that the count of such primes up to is asymptotic to , where is a Möbius-weighted sum over the degrees of the fields ; this expression incorporates the correction, needed for special , to Artin's originally proposed universal constant.
Hooley proved the full asymptotic conditionally, assuming generalized Riemann hypotheses for the relevant Dedekind zeta functions [Hooley1967Artin]. Unconditionally the situation is curious: results are known for restricted alternatives, valid outside small exceptional sets of candidate bases, yet not a single specific admissible has been proved unconditionally to satisfy the conjecture. The literature is surveyed by Moree [Moree2012Artin], and refinements continue to be studied [GoldmakherEtAl2025Artin].
A resolution requires either removing the Riemann hypotheses from Hooley's argument or a different approach entirely; the conjecture is open.
References (4)
- [Artin1927Primitive]
Artin’s primitive root conjecture—a survey
Emil Artin, correspondence to Helmut Hasse (27 September 1927), historical account in Pieter Moree · 1927 · misc
- [Hooley1967Artin]
On Artin’s conjecture
Open ↗Christopher Hooley · 1967 · misc
- [Moree2012Artin]
Artin’s primitive root conjecture—a survey
Open ↗Pieter Moree · 2012 · misc
- [GoldmakherEtAl2025Artin]
Refinements of Artin’s primitive root conjecture
Open ↗Leo Goldmakher et al. · 2025 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.