Twelve-stage ninth-order explicit Runge–Kutta method
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
Determine whether there exist real coefficients \(a_{ij}\) (\(1\le j<i\le12\)) and \(b_i\) (\(1\le i\le12\)), with \(c_i=\sum_{j<i}a_{ij}\), such that the explicit Runge--Kutta one-step map
\[
k_i=f\!\left(t+c_i h,\ y+h\sum_{j<i}a_{ij}k_j\right),\qquad y^+=y+h\sum_{i=1}^{12}b_i k_i
\]
has classical order \(9\): for every integer \(q\ge1\), every sufficiently smooth \(f:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^q\to\mathbb R^q\), and every exact solution of \(y'=f(t,y)\), one step initialized at \(y(t)\) satisfies \(y^+-y(t+h)=O(h^{10})\) as \(h\to0\).Notes
Explicit Runge–Kutta methods advance the solution of an ordinary differential equation one step using stage evaluations of the right-hand side, and a classical question, going back to Butcher's systematic study of high-order processes in the 1960s, asks for the minimal number of stages needed to attain each order [Butcher1964Processes]. This problem is the first unresolved finite case: do real coefficients exist making a twelve-stage explicit method of classical order nine?
The order conditions form a large structured system of polynomial equations indexed by rooted trees — several hundred conditions through order nine — so the question amounts to real solvability of that system [Butcher2016NumericalMethods]. Minimal stage counts are settled through order eight, where eleven stages are necessary and sufficient. For order nine the rigorous lower bound does not exclude twelve stages; a thirteen-stage candidate has been reported via symbolic-numeric solution of the Butcher equations [Khashin2010Symbolic], and exact order-nine methods with fifteen stages are known [Verner2014LowerStage].
The twelve-stage case is undecided in either direction: no solution of the order-nine conditions with twelve stages has been produced, and no proof of nonexistence is known.
References (4)
- [Butcher1964Processes]
On Runge–Kutta Processes of High Order
Open ↗Butcher, John C. · 1964 · article
- [Khashin2010Symbolic]
A Symbolic-Numeric Approach to the Solution of the Butcher Equations
Open ↗Khashin, Sergey · 2010 · misc
- [Verner2014LowerStage]
Explicit Runge–Kutta Pairs with Lower Stage-Order
Open ↗Verner, James H. · 2014 · article
- [Butcher2016NumericalMethods]
Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations
Open ↗Butcher, John C. · 2016 · book
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.