Unique Games Conjecture
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
For every \(\varepsilon,\delta\in(0,1)\), there is an
alphabet size \(q\), where \([q]=\{1,\ldots,q\}\), such that the
following promise problem is \(NP\)-hard. The input is a finite directed
constraint graph in which every arc \(u\to v\) carries a permutation
\(\pi_{uv}\) of \([q]\); a labeling \(\ell:V\to[q]\) satisfies that arc
when \(\ell(v)=\pi_{uv}(\ell(u))\). Distinguish
\[
\begin{array}{ll}
\text{YES:}&\text{some labeling satisfies at least }1-\varepsilon
\text{ of the constraints};\\
\text{NO:}&\text{every labeling satisfies at most }\delta
\text{ of them.}
\end{array}
\]Notes
The Unique Games Conjecture, posed by Khot in 2002, concerns constraint graphs in which each edge carries a permutation of a finite alphabet and a labeling satisfies the edge if . It asserts that for every there is an alphabet size for which it is -hard to distinguish instances where some labeling satisfies at least a fraction of the constraints from instances where every labeling satisfies at most a fraction [Khot2002UGC].
Its importance lies in its consequences. Assuming the conjecture, Raghavendra showed that for every constraint-satisfaction problem a canonical semidefinite programming relaxation achieves the optimal approximation ratio, so the conjecture would pin down sharp inapproximability thresholds across a broad landscape of optimization problems [Raghavendra2008CSP]. Strong algorithms and hardness results are known in important parameter regimes, and the conjecture continues to drive intensive research [IAS2026UniqueGames].
Neither the full quantified statement nor its negation has been proved. A resolution requires either an efficient distinguishing algorithm covering all parameter settings or an -hardness reduction matching the conjectured thresholds.
References (3)
- [Khot2002UGC]
On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games
Open ↗Subhash Khot · 2002 · misc
- [Raghavendra2008CSP]
Optimal algorithms and inapproximability results for every CSP?
Open ↗Prasad Raghavendra · 2008 · misc
- [IAS2026UniqueGames]
The limits of close enough: Unique Games
Open ↗Institute for Advanced Study · 2026 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.