Lehmer’s Nonvanishing Conjecture for Ramanujan’s -function
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
Define integers \(\tau(n)\) by
\[
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\tau(n)q^n
=q\prod_{m=1}^{\infty}(1-q^m)^{24}\qquad(|q|<1).
\] Then \(\tau(n)\ne0\) for every integer \(n\ge1\).Notes
Ramanujan's -function records the coefficients of the discriminant cusp form of weight . In 1947 D. H. Lehmer asked whether ever vanishes and conjectured that it does not; he showed that the least with , if one exists, must be prime, and verified nonvanishing in an initial range [Lehmer1947Tau].
Because is multiplicative and satisfies a recursion at prime powers, a zero anywhere forces a zero at a prime, so the conjecture is equivalent to for every prime . Serre, using Galois representations and the Chebotarev density theorem, showed that the primes with — should any exist — form a set of density zero, with quantitative estimates [Serre1981Lacunarity]. Rouse and Thorner obtained much stronger density bounds via an explicit form of the Sato–Tate distribution for [RouseThorner2019Lehmer], and computation has pushed direct verification far beyond Lehmer's original range.
A hypothetical zero is thus confined to an extremely sparse set of primes, yet nothing excludes it entirely. The conjecture remains open; a proof must rule out for every prime, not merely for almost all.
References (3)
- [Lehmer1947Tau]
The vanishing of Ramanujan’s function
Open ↗D. H. Lehmer · 1947 · misc
- [Serre1981Lacunarity]
Quelques applications du théorème de densité de Chebotarev
Open ↗Jean-Pierre Serre · 1981 · misc
- [RouseThorner2019Lehmer]
The explicit Sato–Tate conjecture and densities pertaining to Lehmer-type questions
Open ↗Jeremy Rouse and Jesse Thorner · 2019 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.