Littlewood Conjecture

OPENMajorConjectureProposed c. 1930 · Full conjecture

Canonical statement

For all real numbers α,β\alpha,\beta,
lim infnnnαnβ=0, \liminf_{n\to\infty} n\,\|n\alpha\|\,\|n\beta\|=0,
where x=minmZxm\|x\|=\min_{m\in\mathbb Z}|x-m|.
View source LaTeX
For all real numbers \(\alpha,\beta\),
\[
  \liminf_{n\to\infty} n\,\|n\alpha\|\,\|n\beta\|=0,
\] where \(\|x\|=\min_{m\in\mathbb Z}|x-m|\).

The conjecture states that for every pair of real numbers α,β\alpha,\beta one has lim infnnnαnβ=0\liminf_{n\to\infty}n\,\|n\alpha\|\,\|n\beta\|=0, where x\|x\| denotes the distance from xx to the nearest integer. Informally, no two reals can both resist rational approximation along a common sequence of denominators. The problem is traditionally attributed to Littlewood around 1930, although no securely dated written proposal is known.

Cassels and Swinnerton-Dyer reformulated the question in terms of products of three homogeneous linear forms, opening the connection with what became the theory of diagonal flows on spaces of lattices [CasselsSwinnertonDyer1955]. That dynamical route led to the strongest known result: Einsiedler, Katok, and Lindenstrauss proved that the set of pairs (α,β)(\alpha,\beta) violating the conjecture has Hausdorff dimension zero [EinsiedlerKatokLindenstrauss2006]. Since the statement holds trivially unless both numbers are badly approximable, any counterexample already lies in a thin set.

A set of dimension zero can still be nonempty, and even simple explicit pairs of quadratic irrationals remain unsettled. A resolution requires showing the exceptional set is empty, or producing a pair for which the product stays bounded away from zero; the conjecture remains a central open problem of Diophantine approximation [Moshchevitin2012Open].

The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.