Schanuel’s Conjecture
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
For every integer \(n\ge1\), if \(z_1,\ldots,z_n\in\mathbb C\) are linearly independent over \(\mathbb Q\), then
\[
\operatorname{trdeg}_{\mathbb Q}
\mathbb Q(z_1,\ldots,z_n,e^{z_1},\ldots,e^{z_n})\ge n,
\]
where \(\operatorname{trdeg}_{\mathbb Q}\) denotes transcendence degree over \(\mathbb Q\).Notes
Schanuel's conjecture asserts that if are complex numbers linearly independent over , then the field has transcendence degree at least over . Schanuel circulated the conjecture orally around 1960, and an early printed source is Lang's 1966 book on transcendental numbers [Lang1966Transcendental], so the proposal date is approximate.
The case follows from the Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem, but already outstrips known methods: taking and , the conjecture would give the algebraic independence of and , which is unproven — it is not even known that is irrational. The conjecture would subsume the classical transcendence theory of the exponential function. It also has a life in logic: Macintyre and Wilkie showed that decidability of the first-order theory of the real exponential field follows from a real form of Schanuel's conjecture [MacintyreWilkie1996], and the conjecture is central to Zilber's pseudoexponentiation program [Marker2006Schanuel].
It remains open; existing transcendence machinery does not control the joint transcendence degree of the numbers involved.
References (3)
- [Lang1966Transcendental]
Introduction to Transcendental Numbers
Serge Lang · 1966 · misc
- [MacintyreWilkie1996]
On the decidability of the real exponential field
Open ↗Angus Macintyre and A. J. Wilkie · 1996 · misc
- [Marker2006Schanuel]
A remark on Zilber’s pseudoexponentiation
Open ↗David Marker · 2006 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.