Four Exponentials Conjecture
Canonical statement
View source LaTeX
If \(x_1,x_2\in\mathbb C\) are linearly independent over \(\mathbb Q\) and \(y_1,y_2\in\mathbb C\) are linearly independent over \(\mathbb Q\), then at least one of the four numbers
\[
e^{x_i y_j}\qquad(1\le i,j\le2)
\] is transcendental.Notes
The four exponentials conjecture asserts that if are complex numbers linearly independent over the rationals, and are likewise linearly independent over the rationals, then at least one of the four numbers with is transcendental. The problem entered the transcendence literature in the mid-1960s, appearing in Lang's book [Lang1966Transcendental], though no single first-proposal date can be fixed with certainty.
The natural point of comparison is the six exponentials theorem: the same conclusion is a proved theorem when one of the two families has three members instead of two, that is, for a array of exponentials. The gap between the proved case and the conjectured case has resisted all attempts, as the auxiliary-function constructions that yield six exponentials lack the room to work with only four. The conjecture would follow from Schanuel's conjecture, and it occupies a central place in Waldschmidt's accounts of transcendence and open Diophantine problems [Waldschmidt2000Diophantine], [Waldschmidt2006Open]. It remains open; a resolution requires pushing transcendence methods past the six-exponentials barrier.
References (3)
- [Lang1966Transcendental]
Introduction to Transcendental Numbers
Serge Lang · 1966 · misc
- [Waldschmidt2000Diophantine]
Diophantine Approximation on Linear Algebraic Groups
Open ↗Michel Waldschmidt · 2000 · misc
- [Waldschmidt2006Open]
Open Diophantine problems
Open ↗Michel Waldschmidt · 2004 · misc
The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.