Four Exponentials Conjecture

OPENMajorConjectureProposed c. 1966 · Full conjecture

Canonical statement

If x1,x2Cx_1,x_2\in\mathbb C are linearly independent over Q\mathbb Q and y1,y2Cy_1,y_2\in\mathbb C are linearly independent over Q\mathbb Q, then at least one of the four numbers
exiyj(1i,j2) e^{x_i y_j}\qquad(1\le i,j\le2)
is transcendental.
View source LaTeX
If \(x_1,x_2\in\mathbb C\) are linearly independent over \(\mathbb Q\) and \(y_1,y_2\in\mathbb C\) are linearly independent over \(\mathbb Q\), then at least one of the four numbers
\[
  e^{x_i y_j}\qquad(1\le i,j\le2)
\] is transcendental.

The four exponentials conjecture asserts that if x1,x2x_1,x_2 are complex numbers linearly independent over the rationals, and y1,y2y_1,y_2 are likewise linearly independent over the rationals, then at least one of the four numbers exiyje^{x_iy_j} with 1i,j21\le i,j\le 2 is transcendental. The problem entered the transcendence literature in the mid-1960s, appearing in Lang's book [Lang1966Transcendental], though no single first-proposal date can be fixed with certainty.

The natural point of comparison is the six exponentials theorem: the same conclusion is a proved theorem when one of the two families has three members instead of two, that is, for a 2×32\times 3 array of exponentials. The gap between the proved 2×32\times 3 case and the conjectured 2×22\times 2 case has resisted all attempts, as the auxiliary-function constructions that yield six exponentials lack the room to work with only four. The conjecture would follow from Schanuel's conjecture, and it occupies a central place in Waldschmidt's accounts of transcendence and open Diophantine problems [Waldschmidt2000Diophantine], [Waldschmidt2006Open]. It remains open; a resolution requires pushing transcendence methods past the six-exponentials barrier.

The boxed statement is the canonical open formulation — not a stronger variant or a related research program. The status reflects the catalog's last review; do your own literature search before investing serious effort.