The catalog

All problems

Every statement in the catalog, readable in place. Filters apply instantly; search covers names, IDs, and the LaTeX statements themselves.

Showing 20 of 280 problems in Logic and foundations
TCS-001

PP versus NPNP

IconicOpen problem1971
Is
Here is the class of decision languages recognized by deterministic Turing machines in polynomial time, and is the class recognized by nondeterministic Turing machines in polynomial time (equivalently, languages with polynomial-size certificates verifiable in deterministic polynomial time).
TCS-025

NP-Hardness of the Minimum Circuit Size Problem

MajorOpen problemc. 1975
The Minimum Circuit Size Problem (MCSP) takes as input the -bit truth table of a Boolean function and an integer , and asks whether has a Boolean circuit over the fixed complete basis , with and of fan-in two, and with at most gates. Is MCSP -hard under deterministic polynomial-time many-one reductions?
LOG-INF-006

Shelah’s Categoricity Conjecture for Lω1,ωL_{\omega_1,\omega}

LandmarkConjecturec. 1977
Let be a sentence of the countable infinitary logic , which permits countable conjunctions and disjunctions but only finite strings of quantifiers. If has, up to isomorphism, exactly one model of some cardinality , then it has exactly one model of every cardinality , where , , and at limit ordinals.
LOG-SET-007

HOD Conjecture

LandmarkConjecturec. 2010
Assume there is an extendible cardinal, meaning a cardinal such that for every ordinal there are an ordinal and an elementary embedding with critical point and . Then there is a proper class of regular cardinals that are not -strongly measurable in . Here is the class of hereditarily ordinal-definable sets, and a regular is -strongly measurable in if there is with such that has no partition of into stationary sets.
LOG-COMP-008

Martin’s Conjecture for Borel Turing-Invariant Functions

MajorConjecturec. 1978
Let be the set of subsets of , identified with the reals, and let , , and denote Turing reducibility, Turing equivalence, and the Turing jump. A map is Turing-invariant if implies . A Turing cone is a set . For Borel Turing-invariant maps define
and write when both and . Then: 1. Every Borel Turing-invariant is either constant in Turing degree on a cone, or . 2. The quotient by of the maps satisfying is well-ordered by , and the immediate successor of is represented by .